Economists had expected a house-price bloodbath. In March 2022, when the Federal Reserve first started raising interest rates to combat resurgent inflation, the average value of a house in a rich country was 41% higher than five years earlier. Prices had bounced back from the financial crisis of 2007-09, then rocketed during the covid-19 pandemic (see chart). 目前2023房價比2017年還要高41%, 2017年當時房價已經恢復08金融風暴前水準
Global house prices have certainly come off the boil. They are 3% below their recent peak, or 8-10% lower once adjusted for inflation. This is in line with the average correction since the late 19th century. Yet this slump should have been different because it followed a boom when prices rose at their fastest rate of all time. The upshot is that real house prices remain miles above the level of 2019. Many millennials and Gen-Zers, who had dreamt that a crash would allow them to buy their first house, are no doubt disappointed. 許多千禧世代和Z世代, 都希望目前房價回檔一些, 好買進他們人生中第一棟房子 ( 暗示全美購屋需求未來一直都存在)
By
contrast with previous housing slumps, there is no hint that lower house prices
have created financial contagion. Banks do not seem worried about a surge in
bad mortgages. They have fewer risky loans and have not binged on dodgy
subprime securities. In New Zealand mortgage arrears have risen, but remain
below their pre-pandemic norm. In America delinquencies on single-family
mortgages recently hit a post-financial-crisis low. In Canada the share of
mortgages in arrears is close to an all-time low.
Nor
do property woes appear to be throttling the wider economy. Weaker housing
investment is dragging on economic growth, but the effect is small. In previous
housing busts the number of builders declined sharply long before the rest of
the labour market weakened. Yet today there is still red-hot demand for them.
In South Korea construction employment has dropped slightly from its pandemic
highs but now seems to be growing again. In America it is rising by 2.5% a
year, in line with the long-run average. In New Zealand construction vacancies
remain well above historical levels.
Three
factors explain the rich world’s surprising housing resilience: migration,
household finances, and people’s preferences. Take migration first, which is
breaking records across the rich world. In Australia net migration is running
at twice pre-pandemic levels, while in Canada it is double the previous high.
Demand from the new arrivals is supporting the market. Research suggests that
every 100,000 net migrants to Australia raise house prices by 1%. In London,
the first port of call for many new arrivals to Britain, rents for new lets
rose by 16% last year.
Strong
household finances, the second factor, also play a role. Richer folk drove the
housing boom, with post-crisis mortgage regulations shutting out less
creditworthy buyers. In America in 2007 the median mortgagor had a credit score
of around 700 (halfway decent), but in 2021 it was close to 800 (pretty good).
Wealthier households can more easily absorb higher mortgage payments. But many
borrowers will also have locked in past low interest rates. From 2011 to 2021
the share of mortgages across the eu on variable rates fell from close to 40%
to less than 15%. Even as rates have risen, the average ratio of debt-service
payments to income across the rich world remains lower than its pre-pandemic
norm. As a result fewer households have had to downsize, or sell up, than
during previous slumps.
The
pandemic itself has played a role. In 2020-21 many households drastically cut
back on consumption, leading to the accumulation of large “excess savings”
worth many trillions of dollars. This stash of savings has also cushioned
families from higher interest rates. Analysis by Goldman Sachs suggests a
positive correlation across countries between the stock of excess savings and
resilience in house prices. Canadians accumulated vast savings during the
pandemic; home prices there have recently stabilised. Swedes amassed smaller
war chests, and their housing market is a lot weaker.
The
third factor relates to people’s preferences. Research published by the Bank of
England suggests that shifts in people’s wants—such as the desire for a home
office, or a house rather than a flat—explained half of the growth in British
house prices during the pandemic. In many countries, including Australia, the
average household size has shrunk, suggesting that people are less willing to
house-share. And at a time of higher inflation, many people may want to invest
in physical assets, such as property, infrastructure and farmland, that better
hold their value in real terms. All this could mean that housing demand will
remain higher than it was before the pandemic, limiting the potential fall in
prices.
The Housing
Market is Worse Than You Think
In this
letter I’d like to explore the impact interest rates will
have on the economy and especially the housing market.
Currently,
the 30-year mortgage rate is pushing 7.6%, up from less than 3% a year ago,
while the median house price in the US is up 37% from $320k in 2019 to $440k
today. You cannot have both interest rates and housing prices making new highs.
Something's got to give.
Let’s start with
new home buyers, as they’ll be impacted the most.
If you are a
first-time home buyer, you don’t have home equity to roll into
a new purchase. If you bought a house in 2019 for $320k (assuming you put down
20% of the purchase price as down payment), your annual mortgage payment at 4%
would have been $15k.
Two years
later, in 2021, you would have paid $420k for the same four walls and white
picket fence (dogs, spouse and 2.5 kids sold separately). However, despite a
37% house price increase, thanks to Uncle Fed, you would have been able to
finance this purchase at 3%, and your annual mortgage payment would have gone
up to $17k – a manageable $2k annual increase.
As I have
mentioned, today the median house price is at $440,000, but the interest rate
has skyrocketed to 7.6%. Thus, if you are a first-time home buyer, the same
American dream would cost you $30k a year – that is a
$13k increase from just a year ago.
Let me put
this in proper context – median annual household income
in the US is about $75k, or about $60k after taxes. In other words, half your
after-tax income is now going to servicing your mortgage if you bought today at
peak home prices and rates.
It is easy to
see how the combination of high prices and rising interest rates have turned
the American dream of owning a home into a nightmare. For affordability to come
back to 2020 at current interest rates, housing prices have to decline more
than 40% to $250k. If this were to happen, anyone who bought a house since 2012
would be underwater on their initial purchase.
It is hard to
envision this rapid price decline happening overnight. Just like stock prices,
housing prices are set by supply and demand. But houses are not like stocks.
People live in their houses, raise their kids there, create memories, and thus
get emotionally attached to them. Also, many decades of declining interest
rates and rising housing prices have convinced the public that increasing
housing prices must be guaranteed by the US Constitution in tandem with the
right to the pursuit of happiness.
When we
decide to sell our house and we receive offers that are below the highest price
we saw on Zillow just a few months earlier, we wait for the right, higher offer
to come in. This is why the fact that we live in our houses is important - we
are emotionally attached to them and want the best offer possible. This is also
why housing prices are quick to move up and slow to come down. It takes
multiple painful conversations with a realtor to convince us to start lowering
the asking price.
This is where
things get even more complicated. There are two types of sellers: people who
must sell their houses (moving to a new city, lost a job, got divorced) and
those who would like to sell their houses (bored with their old four walls,
need a bigger or smaller house, would like their kids to go to better schools
etc.). I am generalizing here.
Our house is
worth what someone else is willing and able to pay for it.
Let’s contrast
two transactions:
You are at a
grocery store – you want to buy tomatoes, but the price of tomatoes
has doubled. Your credit card company is not going to say, “Jane, you
cannot buy tomatoes. They are too expensive. You cannot afford them.” Unless you
are maxing out your credit limit, your credit card company doesn’t care how
you spend your (borrowed) money.
This is not
what happens when you take out a mortgage on your house. After being blamed for
the last housing crisis, bankers became born-again bankers: they found
underwriting religion. If an average consumer walks into a bank asking for a
loan, this born-again banker will look at the cost of the house in relation to
the buyer’s income and will politely tell the buyer to look
for a cheaper house or start driving Uber on weekends.
In the past,
a lateral change from one house to another did not really cost you much, other
than transaction costs. However, if you refinanced your house at 3% when rates
dropped, as many people did, today this lateral move would cost you dearly.
How much?
The median
mortgage on a house today is about $220k, and the median home equity loan is
$40k. My goal here is to be vaguely right rather than complicatedly precise, so
I assume that an average homeowner owes a total of $260k for their house. If
the house was refinanced at 3–4% interest rates in 2021 and
2022, then that average homeowner is paying about $13–15k a year
for their house.
Unfortunately,
the mortgage is attached to a house. Selling a house cancels an existing
mortgage, and a new house requires a new mortgage at market rates, which today
are 7.6%. Thus, this new mortgage would cost $22k a year, or a $7–9k increase.
Just selling your house and moving to a similarly priced house a few blocks
away would cost about 10% of your annual income! This explains why the number
of transactions in the housing market has hit a multi-decade low.
(When my
brother Alex, a realtor, asked me if my housing market analysis came with any
good news, I told him, yes, your family loves you.)
When prices
go up, people who want and must sell a house are selling with ease. As prices
decline, at first only people who must sell are selling. However, as time goes
by, selling becomes less and less discretionary as a desire to sell turns into
a need.
People who
must sell their houses will have to accept lower prices. How much lower? That
is impacted not just by a seller’s willingness to accept a lower
price (supply) but also by a prospective buyer’s ability to
borrow (demand).
I hear this
argument at times: “In the 1980s interest rates were higher than they
are today, and we had a functioning housing market.” There is a
substantial difference between then and now. Today the median house price in
relation to median income is at the highest level in modern US history, even higher
than it was at the height of the housing bubble in 2007. It is almost double
the level of the early 1980s.
Side note:
The situation I described above is not unique to the US. In fact, other
countries, including Australia, Canada, and the UK, are experiencing much
bigger housing bubbles.
Today,
consumers’ discretionary income is being attacked by inflation
from different directions: The cost of everything is up, from trash collection
to food. Gasoline prices have declined, likely due to our tapping into our
strategic oil reserve and the slowdown in the economy. Food prices are less
likely to decline, though I could be wrong, since they are driven by currently
elevated prices of fertilizers (I wrote about that here.)
But it doesn’t stop there.
Higher interest rates make anything that needs to be financed more expensive – cars,
refrigerators, iPhones, big-screen TVs, etc. Over the last decade we got
spoiled by zero-percent financing. Unless interest rates go back down, those
days are over.
It is important
to mention that wage increases to date have lagged inflation by a large margin.
The federal government has thrown a bone to retirees by promising to raise
Social Security payments in 2023.
Spending is
both a financial and a psychological decision. If you feel wealthy and
confident in your future, you are willing to spend your savings and borrow
(against future earnings) to buy stuff. The stock market decline and declining
housing prices, along with rising unemployment, will undermine consumer confidence
and willingness to spend. Also, falling
housing prices will start to undermine the housing ATM (home equity), and
rising interest rates will make borrowing against the house more expensive and
reduce equity people have in their houses – thus fewer homeowners
will undertake home improvement projects or tap out home equity to subsidize
their day-to-day living expenses.
沒有留言:
張貼留言